Platform rescue and modernization
Untangle fragile applications, old frameworks, ad hoc data flows, vendor APIs, authentication, reporting, and infrastructure before they become a bonfire with login screens.
I help organizations turn brittle software, legacy integrations, unclear platforms, and half-finished modernization efforts into systems that are stable, observable, and worth building on.
The work is part architect, part hands-on engineer, part translator for leadership, and part field mechanic. No theater. No twelve-month fog machine. Just the map, the risk, the fix, and the next useful release.
Best fit: small to mid-sized organizations, SaaS teams, nonprofits, public-safety adjacent groups, education, healthcare, manufacturing, and founder-led companies that need senior technical judgment without hiring a permanent CTO too early.
Untangle fragile applications, old frameworks, ad hoc data flows, vendor APIs, authentication, reporting, and infrastructure before they become a bonfire with login screens.
Set direction, make build-vs-buy calls, define the architecture, calm the backlog, and give leadership a plan they can understand without sanding off the truth.
Java, relational databases, Linux, integrations, APIs, ETL, queues, observability, SaaS operations, and pragmatic full-stack work when the situation calls for it.
Dartmouth Advancement required stable production systems, auditability, disciplined change control, security-minded operations, and clear communication with non-technical leadership.
I’m comfortable where old systems, vendor platforms, custom code, databases, scripts, and newer SaaS tools all have to cooperate. The goal is not purity. The goal is working machinery.
I have built mobile apps, internal platforms, CRM/data systems, reporting tools, integrations, and early-stage products where architecture and product judgment had to travel in the same truck.
CAD, 3D printing, microcontroller programming, public safety, ski operations, edge devices, and sensor systems give me unusual range where software has to touch the real world.
I do not sell vague retainers into vague problems. The first engagement should identify what exists, where it fails, what matters financially or operationally, and what should happen next.
Fixed scope, usually two weeks.
One prioritized execution stream.
Direction, delivery, and senior technical judgment.
If the system matters, people depend on it, and nobody quite trusts it anymore, that is probably the conversation.